All Episodes

Bitcoin Audible

Chat_133 - Bitcoin Development & Controversy with Antoine Poinsot

By Guy Swann

Aired May 21, 2025 · 1h 47m · Last boosted May 24, 2025

View Show
Show Notes

"People can use inscriptions today and they do use them. If on the one hand you believe that marginally raising the costs to unwanted usage of the chain is going to succeed in discouraging them, which, fair, we can discuss it. I disagree but we can discuss it. On the other hand, you cannot say that, oh well, making it four times four times more expensive is going to incentivize them to do more of it. They are not compatible arguments. So the OP_RETURN is not an invitation. It's not a signal to VCs or crypto...

Nostr Boost Stats

sats
900
boosts
2
boosters
2
Other Episodes This Community Boosts Other shows' episodes boosted by people who boosted this episode
Aug 30, 2024
Nostr Boosts:1k
BGlassSep 2, 2024
500
👍
BGlassAug 31, 2024
500
🫡
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:800
BGlassMay 9, 2026
400
BGlassApr 9, 2026
400
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:800
BGlassMay 11, 2025
400
BGlassMay 11, 2025
400
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:800
BGlassJan 9, 2025
400
🫡
BGlassJan 9, 2025
400
See all boosts
Sep 11, 2024
Nostr Boosts:10k
BGlassSep 12, 2024
10k
Thanks Moe and Adam. A good show to cap it.
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:1k
BGlassApr 23, 2025
1k
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:1k
rarsonApr 10, 2025
1k
Awesome episode!
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:1k
rarsonDec 19, 2024
1k
I am a TNG maxi, personally.
See all boosts
Aug 10, 2025
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassAug 17, 2025
500
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassJan 2, 2025
500
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassJan 1, 2025
500
👍
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 29, 2024
500
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 29, 2024
500
🫡
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 29, 2024
500
👍
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 29, 2024
500
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 29, 2024
500
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 29, 2024
500
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 20, 2024
500
🫡
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 20, 2024
500
Putin's coming for Europe! 😅
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 20, 2024
500
🫡
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 20, 2024
500
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 17, 2024
500
👍
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 17, 2024
500
🫡
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 17, 2024
500
👍
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 17, 2024
500
👍
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 17, 2024
500
🫡
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 17, 2024
500
👍
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:500
BGlassDec 17, 2024
500
👍
See all boosts

Nostr Community

Everyone who has boosted Chat_133 - Bitcoin Development & Controversy with Antoine Poinsot on Nostr, ranked by sats sent, all time.

  1. Mr. ₿usiness 500 sats
  2. B 400 sats

Episode Boosts

Every boost sent to this episode, as published to Nostr, newest first.

  • 500 via Fountain
    Great episode! I respect Antoine, but unfortunately the majority of opinions he expressed are the same things we've already heard from Core devs, many of which don't make logical sense. The idea that an increased use of OP_RETURN for spam purposes won't happen because spammers are already using the witness data is absurd. They are two different things. It is equally as absurd as saying that they will stop using witness data and use OP_RETURN instead, which we know is not the case for things like ordinals because they CAN'T. It is the same as saying "the filters don't work, we need to remove the filters because they encourage spammers to go directly to miners." Also, the idea that no core devs want spam on bitcoin is factually untrue. Lopp has specifically stated that he is "a fan of new technology," ie shitcoinery on bitcoin. He is not concerned for the monetary use case of bitcoin but rather sees the timechain as a developer playground. Lastly, I am deeply, deeply troubled by the apparent defeatist mentality of Core developers that fighting spam is a losing battle. In a tweet from March 8th, Lopp posted this: "OP_RETURN debate is novel due to how factions are split. 1) Ruthlessly rational technical folks who understand the dynamics of the network and don't want to play unending subjective games. 2) Ideological folks upset by how others use the network who want to play those games." Ignoring the arguably inaccurate representation of both sides in that comment, I find it stunning that someone who supposedly gives "insights on security" (per his Twitter bio) thinks that attacks on a network are "unending subjective games" that can simply be opted out of if the developers so choose. Oh how easy information security would be if that were actually the reality, Jameson. Unfortunately in the real world, things like spam and DDoS attacks are very real threats that require constant vigilance to be mitigated. The Core attitude of "we can't stop it, so we might as well gi…
  • 400 via Fountain