Replication of Quantum Factorisation Records with an 8-bit Home Computer, an Abacus, and a Dog (https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1237.pdf)
Since all demonstrations of quantum factorisation to date have involved either sleight-of-hand
numbers, sleight-of-hand preprocessing on a computer, or both, we propose the following
standard evaluation criteria for future claims of quantum factorisation.
- The factors are of a nontrivial size, 64 or 128 bits. This makes the problem space large enough that the solution can’t be found through simple search techniques unrelated to factorisation.
- The factors are two prime values with a large difference between them and containing a 50:50 mix of 0 and 1 bits, randomly distributed. This prevents the construction of sleight-of-hand numbers that are readily amenable to factorisation via physics experiments.
- No preprocessing of the value to be factorised using a computer is permitted. This prevents the problem from being transformed into a different, easily-solved sleight-ofhand problem before the physics experiment even begins.
- The factors are unknown to the experimenters. This prevents the current practice of short-circuiting the factorisation process by taking advantage of knowing the answer
before the process has even begun.
- The factorisation is performed on ten different values with the properties given above. This demonstrates repeatability of the process.
Booster
toxicafunk
First boost Sep 26, 2024 · Last boosted Apr 27, 2026
Nostr Boost Stats
- sats
- 3k
- boosts
- 6
- shows
- 4
Boosts Sent
Every boost this booster has sent, as published to Nostr, newest first.
-
-
Great episode and exactly right! You should read this paper about the quantum computing fraud, would make a great show. https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1237.pdf
-
One of the to five episodes! Thought provoking.
-
-
One of the best!
-
One of the best episodes!





